I didn’t know this topic existed and I’m glad you moved my feedback there @alanh, many thanks!
I had the opportunity to try out more Speed Reviews. I had 91% and 93% win rates, and I still feel bad when I see the Game Over videos. Maybe it’s just me but I think it’s terribly counterproductive if this is supposed to motivate us. It’s like getting a B+ grade and then your teacher says “hello, you are worthless, have a good day”.
I think we should also get more time depending on the length of the question. It’s very stressful when you need to read a phrase with 10+ words, you must read 4 answers of 10+ words, and pick one in just a few seconds.
I kid you not, sometimes I don’t even have the time to read all answers before the time runs out. So now when I see a long question, I try to catch some of the key words and grab the closest answer. This does not work very well, but it’s better than not answering at all because of the lack of time.
I know the old Speed Review already had this issue. Maybe this is supposed to mimic the reality of a conversation where participants don’t have all the time in the world to think before speaking.
If this is wanted, so be it.
I for one highly doubt this design is intended.
In the real world if someone expects a Q/A to end in less than 5 seconds but he asks a long question that takes him 4 seconds, I suppose he would not yell at me if I answered in more than 1 second.